The Da Vinci Code - User Reviews

Thank you for rating this movie!

3.51 / 5

User rating: 3.51

Based on 63556 votes and 2163 reviews


  • User rating: 3.51 27.41%
  • User rating: 3.51 34.73%
  • User rating: 3.51 16.64%
  • User rating: 3.51 4.21%
  • User rating: 3.51 17.01%



Please rate movie 1 to 5 stars






Type the code:


 

Showing 1601 to 1650 of 2163

User review rating: 0 June 03, 2006

One big yawn-fest!

User review rating: 0 June 03, 2006

Excellent but read the book!!!

User review rating: 0 June 03, 2006

Movie was not as good as the book.

User review rating: 0 June 03, 2006

Might be a little slow and confusing for the few that haven`t read the book. A very good transition to celluloid.

User review rating: 0 June 03, 2006

I love Tom Hanks no matter what the movie.

User review rating: 0 June 03, 2006

read the book first or have some religion background

User review rating: 0 June 03, 2006

It was awesome - great mystery movie!

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

I loved the book so I was disapointed with the movie.The start of the film seemed to follow the book closely but the last part of the film dragged on and on and was less like the book.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

great

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

They did not go as controversial as they could have. I think they got nervous. It could have been a whole lot better.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Pretty good but not as good as I expected, hearing all the hype about it.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

the book was better

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Fairly entertaing, but Having read the book, I thought Tom Hanks was miscast. Character should have een younger, maybe Clive Owen or Eric Bana?

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

OVERRATED IT WAS NOT A BAD MOVIE BUT LEFT ALOT MORE QUESTION THAN ANSWERS ABOUT THE DA VINCI CODES.IT SURE DID NOT EFFECT MY FAITH IN ANY WAY

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Clever, insightfull, thought provoking and definitely controversial, yet poignant in it`s approach to a deeply private matter

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

It was an okay movie. the book was much better. don`t think i would have been able to follow the movie if i didn`t read the book first.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

it`d have been better if I hadn`t read the book first

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Great Movie

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

The movie was pretty good. The book was better. But a book is always better. I think they did as well as they could. Most of the story line is in the movie. It could`ve moved faster and Tom Hanks was too much of a passive Robert Langdon but the rest of the cast was great. Paul Bettany as Silas was excellent. Jean Reno was great too and Audrey Tattou was pretty good too. Go see it and judge for yourself.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

The movie followed the novel fairly well, but did not have the intensity the book seemed to convey. Solid performances, but not as exciting as it could have been. You will enjoy.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

good movie but the book was better

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

great story, read the book first

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Good.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Great movie

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

great movie, makes you think

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

very VERY confusing movie. I still don`t know what was happening in the movie. They need to make things more clear.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Really Awesome!!!!!!

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Critics are way off, Hanks is superb, Howard masterful . A great movie

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

GREAT MOVIE!!! Not as good as the book but still a great flick

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Despite what the critics say about this movie, it was an excellent adaptation of the book. Just because there were no great chase scenes or copious gun battles, explosions or bloodshed does not make it a yawner as some critics make it out to be. Oh my we may actually have to pay attention and think for a change what a concept. Read the book or see the movie. Then think could this be true or just a great fictional read.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Loved it!

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

I like Tom Hanks as an actor, but I feel he was miscast for the lead in this movie.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

thought provoking, interesting & informative!

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

I did not read the book prior to seeing the movie so I cannot compare the two. I enjoyed the movie and I would recommend it.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Dissapointed

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

I had not read the book so were some thought it dragged I found it informative.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Pretty good movie. I am one of the few, or at least it seems, that did not read the book so I cannot make comparisons. But I must say I was entertained and the 2.5hr length seemd to fly by.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

I thought it had a lot of suspense, but it also had a lot of funny moments. However, I did like the book better.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Great Movie. I loved it.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Great Movie!

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Great Movie!

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

I thought the movie followed the book quite well. The acting was excellent as well as the casting choices. I can`t wait to watch it again!

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

I loved the book and did not think it possible for the movie to pay it justice. Surprise! The movie was very well done! The only way it could have been improved upon would have required another 2.5 hours.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Overall it was a well made movie, but maybe too close to the book. Considering that most people read the book before seeing the movie, it would be nice if the movie swayed away from the book more than just near the end. On the other hand, most movies that I watch after reading the book I find disappointing. This movie wasn`t. It was very well done, and kept up with the book.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

I thought the movie was ok but the book was much better. So much had to be cut out to make it fit in 2 1/2 hours it seemed a lot of important historical information was lost.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Was great need more movies like this

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

stayed really close to the book...at least in all the actually important points!

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

Tom Hanks makes this movie work.

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

It`s is great when a movie creates this much discussion, positive or negative. Debate keeps our brains fresh

User review rating: 0 June 02, 2006

A bit long, cinematography was great though!

  Change Location